Periscope Holdings Logo
Blog | 02.24.21
By John Walters

What Public Sector Suppliers Need to Know About Supply Chain Disruptions and Contractual Obligations

There are a lot of words that can be used to describe supply chain disruptions: expensive, embarrassing, and downright frustrating for suppliers and customers alike. However, we shouldn’t forget that many supply chain disruptions are often unpredictable, and they are not always preventable. Even businesses that have contingency plans in place for all kinds of situations may have to close or scale back operations for prolonged periods of time in certain situations. We’ve witnessed two in the past year: the COVID-19 pandemic and the recent “once-in-a-lifetime” winter storm in Texas.

This may leave businesses with government contracts feeling vulnerable. If people can’t make it to work and businesses can’t fulfill contractual terms in the middle of an emergency – when government customers may need them most – will there be consequences?  Possibly. However, there are many instances in which a “failure to deliver” will be excused.

Is Your Business Protected?

Though hurricanes, earthquakes, winter storms and other natural disasters are notorious for wreaking havoc far beyond the communities on which they bear down, they are also considered “acts of God” per many government business regulations, including Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) guidelines. That means that related supply chain disruptions – and missed deadlines – are considered “excusable delays” by federal, state and local agencies that rely on the FAR to government contract execution. Strikes, quarantines and freight embargoes also fall into this “excusable delays” category among other incidents that occur beyond a contractor’s control. (See FAR 52.249-8 for the Fixed Price Supply and Service excusable delay clause and FAR 52.249-10 for the Fixed Price Construction default clause.)

Plainly put, you may be protected from government repercussions if you are unable to fulfill your contractual obligations in these “excusable” situations. This is assuming that the agency follows the FAR and there’s no evidence that “the failure to perform” was the result of negligence or fault on your part, and you notify customers immediately of any issues.

Now, that doesn’t mean that you’re shielded from any government action. Many state and local governments define their own contract terms and don’t follow the FAR. So, it’s important to understand your contract terms before you sign.

Look for a “Termination for Convenience” Clause

While agency customers most likely won’t hold you “liable for any excess costs” or do anything detrimental to your performance record in the case of a natural disaster, they are not obligated to just sit around and wait for you to deliver promised commodities or services either. They have options for handling delays if necessary. For example, they can:

  • Renegotiate terms to extend the delivery schedule: This is the best-case scenario for any government contractor impacted by a natural disaster or other “excusable” factor. Many government agencies will be willing to accommodate delays as long as they are not sourcing essential goods or services for their own recovery efforts or requiring the contracted items for other critical missions. It’s easier to secure the customer’s agreement to new contract terms if you can confidently provide a new delivery date. Just don’t overpromise, as you’ll need to meet that new deadline to stay in compliance.
  • Request a unilateral contract “termination for convenience”: This typically occurs when the government agency needs the item or service faster than you can deliver it given the unforeseen circumstances. It will then seek an alternate source capable of meeting the tight deadlines. If this happens, your contract will be terminated, but you won’t owe the government any concessions and you won’t be penalized in any way. In fact, you may be in a position to request compensation from the government agency via bilateral settlement in the following months. It may be in the form of a restocking fee or other reimbursement for “lost expenses” due to its cancellation action. Just be ready to prove that the compensation is warranted (i.e., it was already in route, but just stopped in transit due to the extenuating event.)
  • Cancel at no cost to both parties: This type of contract cancellation will require some concession on your part, as it requires mutual agreement by both you and the government agency to part ways without any resulting compensation. You won’t owe the government anything, but it won’t owe you anything either. While this is rare, it could benefit you as a contractor if you anticipate an extended recovery period or don’t have confidence that you will be able to fulfill your obligations in a reasonable period of time. For example, if your supplier is on back order for six months and you haven’t incurred any expenses, it will expedite the contract cancellation process and potentially win you favor with that contracting officer for future opportunities. This is considered a good faith gesture on both sides because it reduces the amount of administrative burden on both the government contractor and government buyer.

Don’t forget: You must notify the customer as soon as you realize that you will not be able to meet the contract terms, regardless of the reason. If you delay notification, then you could be held accountable for a negligent default or “at fault” breach of contract. This is true even if the root cause is uncontrollable, such as a power outages or road closures due to a massive snow and ice storm.  

For more guidance on how to handle emergency situations, contact your assigned procurement official or refer to the terms of your specific contract.  

And, if you have the resources to support emergency recovery and relief efforts, log in daily to the Periscope Supplier to Government (S2G) dashboard to check for new solicitations. Many agencies are looking for vendors who can deliver critical goods and services to their end users and constituents in the wake of disruptive events. 

About the Author

John Walters

John Walters is a co-founder of Periscope Holdings and is currently the NIGP Program Director where he works with the NIGP Code and NIGP Consulting practices.